
While the country’s attention was drawn to the death of 44 SAF policemen in an operation in Maguindanao, a House of Representatives committee quietly conducted a hearing the other week on the difficulties that politicians allegedly go through in their banking transactions. The hearing is an offshoot of House Resolution 1857, which seeks an inquiry into the practice of banks of refusing to accept deposits to the accounts of their legitimate depositors, or the opening of news accounts of relatives, of politically exposed persons even for amounts not covered by law. Its proponent, Rep. Rodolfo Fariñas, said the banks’ action was “causing undue convenience, damage and prejudice” to those persons. A politically exposed person (PEP) is “a natural person who is or has been entrusted with prominent public positions in the Philippines or in a foreign State, including heads of state or government, senior politicians, senior national or local government, judicial or military officials, senior executives of government or state owned or controlled corporations and important political party officials.” At the hearing, Fariñas cited his experience of being treated as a “criminal perpetrator” when he tried to deposit P450,000 in his Citibank account. Citibank denied the imputation and said it conducts due diligence in the acceptance of deposits in compliance with banking regulations. A Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) official stated banks should accept deposits as long as they do not exceed P500,000 and are not suspicious under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. Treatment It is no surprise that the congressmen Read More …