data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41ce9/41ce9d8d75157e95b235f68cd69b764407c2ef41" alt="It’s final: Edca constitutional; petitions vs SC ruling junked"
It’s final, the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (Edca) is constitutional. This, after the Supreme Court, voting 9-4 denied the motions for reconsideration filed by former Senators Rene Saguisag and Wigberto Tañada, and the militant group Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) joined by other party-list groups. Saguisag and Tañada were among the 12 senators who voted to eject US bases in the Philippines in 1991. The high court said petitioners failed to raise new arguments that would warrant a reversal of their Jan. 12 decision. “To this, the Court stated that petitioners do not present new arguments to buttress their claims of error on the part of this Court. They have rehashed their prior arguments and made them responsive to the structure of the Decision in [the Saguisag motion for reconsideration], yet the points being made are the same,” SC’s Information Chief Atty. Theodore Te said at a press conference Tuesday. The high court, last Jan. 12, voting 10-4-1, ruled that Edca is an executive agreement which the President is allowed to enter into under Article XVIII Section 25 of the 1987 Constitution. READ: Supreme Court upholds legality of Edca Saguisag and Tañada, in their motion for reconsideration, said they had difficulty accepting the ruling despite the plain meaning of the constitution “this Honorable Court ruled the way it did.” READ: SC asked to reconsider ruling on Edca “Something that may seal the fate of [my] apos [grandchildren], eldest seven, who loves to play soldier, should not be decided by the President and Defense Read More …