
We write in connection with the reply of the media relations officer of the Insurance Commission seeking to “clarify matters” in relation to the issues raised in the article of Ms. Mary Ann Reyes which was published in the Sept. 14 issue of The Philippine STAR. It is not correct for the Insurance Commission to say that because the civil complaint to recover insurance proceeds for material damage due to fire and business interruption losses provided under the insurance policy issued by the insurers of Steel Corp. of the Philippines (SCP), “(t)here is no way for the Insurance Commission to assume jurisdiction and hear the cases because the claims exceed the jurisdiction amount of P5 million provided under Section 439 of the Insurance Code as amended by RA 10607 which took effect on Sept. 20, 2013.” What is correct is that, as admitted by the reply, “what is pending before the Insurance Commission are administrative cases seeking the suspension and revocation of licenses of the insurance companies who issued the insurance policies involved in the incident. These cases do not seek to recover insurance proceeds for material damage due to fire and business interruption losses provided under the insurance policies.” Indeed, administrative cases filed with the Insurance Commission for its commissioner to exercise his regulatory authority to determine whether or not an insurer has violated certain provision of the Insurance Code are not affected by the filing by the insured of civil complaints with the regular courts for recovery of Read More …