Feb 272013
 
BIR's January 2013 collections up by 11.27%

MANILA, Philippines – The Bureau of Internal Revenue’s collections for January rose by 11.27 percent or P9.59 billion year-on-year, the state agency reported on Wednesday. BIR said it collected P89.03 billion from its operations and P5.71 billion from non-BIR operations for a total of P94.74 billion worth of tax revenues collected in January 2013. The agency collected P85.15 billion in January last year. BIR Commissioner Kim Henares earlier said the agency is aiming to collect P1.25 trillion this year after missing last year’s target by a small margin. BIR has also unveiled 26 major projects to ensure that it will sustain a positive growth in its collections.

Feb 252013
 

THE BUREAU of Internal Revenue’s (BIR) new issuance, Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 16-2013 (RMC 16-2013) clarified the tax treatment of deposits/advances given by clients/customers to their suppliers/providers. This new issuance is an offshoot of RMC 89-2012, which involves cash advances given to General Professional Partnerships (GPPs). Unlike RMC 89-2012, RMC 16-2013 covers all taxpayers, other than GPPs, doing business in the Philippines. The latter details all the tax implications to and obligations of the taxpayer and the client for purposes of recording and documentation of the deposits/cash advance made.

Feb 132013
 
2 flower shops charged for failing to issue receipts

MANILA, Philippines – The Bureau of Internal Revenue filed on Thursday criminal charges against two flower shops who failed to issue receipts in violation of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997. The state agency charged Sylvia Pimentel, sole proprietress of Flowers by Sylvia, a flower shop in San Antonio Village, Makati City. The bureau likewise filed with the Justice Department a complaint against Casa Flores, Inc. and its president Belen Bactad, vice-president Edgar Bactad and treasurer/secretary Fe de Belen Bactad de Leon. BIR said the two flower shops were subjected to covert surveillance operations to verify whether or not they are issuing receipts as mandated by the Tax Code. “Two  BIR investigators acted as poseur customers who bought flowers from Pimentel’s flower shop. Her establishment did not issue to the first buyer any official receipt but instead issued an unregistered provisional receipt that did not conform to the invoicing requirements provided under the Tax Code. It still failed to issue any receipt to the second buyer but instead issued for the second time an unregistered provisional receipt,” the bureau said. BIR added that the same happened with Casa Flores, which only issued an unregistered delivery receipt that did not conform to the invoicing requirements of the Tax Code. “It likewise failed to issue any receipt to the second buyer but issued a cash invoice only upon demand,” BIR said. Business ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1 The shops were served mission orders before the investigators apprehended and Read More …

Feb 042013
 
Transfer mis-pricing: Regulations to address

Intra-related transactions – transactions between related parties or associated enterprises – are a common practice in the globalization of trade. These transactions apply to a parent company and a subsidiary, or two or more companies controlled by a common parent (directly or indirectly and whether or not legally enforceable). When said parties establish a price for the above transactions, they are engaging in Transfer Pricing (TP). TP can be considered to be the most significant tax issue emerging from globalization confronting tax administrations worldwide. This is because related companies are more concerned in their income as a whole rather than as individual corporations, and as such, there is likelihood of manipulating the transfer price by taking advantage of the loopholes in the tax system. As a result, income reported from intra-related transactions decreases. Hence, revenue collection also decreases. And so transfer pricing may really be called transfer mis-pricing! Please note, however, that decrease in the transfer price should not at all times be attributed to manipulation by the related parties. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Transfer Pricing Guidelines provide that the tax administrators should not automatically assume that associated enterprises have sought to manipulate their profits as they may truly experience difficulty in accurately determining a market price, in the absence of market forces or when adopting a particular commercial strategy. OECD TP Guidelines are the motherhood guidelines after which most, if not all, TP guidelines of different jurisdictions have been patterned. By way of addressing the Read More …