Jul 302013
 
An election watchdog on Tuesday branded the P30-million intelligence fund given by Malacañang to the Commission on Elections (Comelec) the poll body’s version of the controversial pork barrel.

During a hearing at the Court of Appeals, the Automated Elections System (AES) Watch presented three checks issued to former Comelec Commissioner Gus Lagman to prove that government funds were used as “intelligence and confidential funds.”

Lagman said the first check, for P200,000, was issued to him in August 2011. The following month, he received another check, this time for P800,000. Finally, a P250,000 check was issued to him in December 2011.

Lagman, who is also a member of AES Watch, said the checks were described in the disbursement as “intelligence and confidential funds.” The former Comelec official said he deposited the checks in his accounts, thinking the funds were to be used for the poll body’s investigation into elections cases that the body was trying at the time.

But when he was asked by the poll body’s chief accountant to liquidate the amount on March 19, he found out that the money was made to appear to have been used for a different purpose.

“Para i-liquidate iyon, kailangan ko lang raw pirmahan iyong isang dokumento, isang one-page document na sinasabi na ginastos ko kung saan saan,” he said.

“Nakalagay sa dokumento, expenses for several items. Sabi ko di naman totoo ito, so isinauli ko na lang,” Lagman said. He said he could not remember what those “items” were but said the items were described in just one paragraph.

Lagman said the “intelligence fund” could be compared to Congress’ “pork barrel” or the Priority Development Assistance Fund, which has become infamous for being allegedly spent by some lawmakers for personal interests instead of using them for their congressional districts.

“Parang ganoon ang lumalabas na parang pork barrel din ito,” Lagman said.

Lawyer Harry Roque, counsel for the petitioners, supported Lagman’s suspicion.

“Kung hindi ito ginamit for surveillance at least magkakaroon ng linaw na iyong halagang bingay sa kanila. Kung hindi ginamit for surveillance or intel purposes ay baka pork barrel ng Comelec,” Roque said.

Lagman clarified that the checks given to him were part of some P10 million given to Comelec commissioners in 2011. He said the amount was still separate from the more recent P30 million “intelligence fund” given to the poll body for the 2013 polls.

Lagman stressed that intelligence funds should only be reserved for the military and police, and not for the Comelec.

During the CA hearing, Roque asked the high court to issue a subpoena against Comelec chairman Sixto Brillantes and Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte.

The CA said it would later issue a resolution on Roque’s request.

The petitioners were accusing Brillantes of hinting that AES Watch members were under surveillance.

“Bakit sila matatakot kung wala silang ginawang masama? Talaga namang ginagamit ang intel fund sa mga nagsasabotahe ng election,” Brillantes was quoted as saying in the media.

The petitioners claimed that Valte also issued a similar statement, quoting her as having said: “The justification is supposed to be utilized for intelligence, counter intelligence activities and gathering of information relative to the activities of certain groups, individuals and technology experts suspected of conducting overt and covert operations to sabotage the results of the elections.”

The AES Watch is asking the Supreme Court to issue a writ of habeas data compelling the Comelec to reveal information it has gathered on AES members. — BM, GMA News

May 272013
 
Proclamation of remaining party-list winners set on Tuesday

The remaining winning party-list groups will be proclaimed Tuesday morning, Commission on Elections (Comelec) chairman Sixto Brillantes said Monday. “Tomorrow at 10 o’clock,” Brillantes told reporters when asked on the schedule of the proclamation. During the National Board of Canvassers (NBOC) session, Brillantes ordered the encoding team to include the corrected discrepanies, zero votes and the remaining uncanvassed report in the canvass report to allow the board to finalize a resolution. “We will finalize the resolution by tonight, it will be signed tomorrow morning and promulgated at 10 am,” Brillantes said on Monday. He, however, did not clarify the content of the resolution that they will issue. Earlier in the day, Brillantes said the Comelec en banc, sitting as the NBOC, will be meeting to discuss the issue on party-list. He said they will be declaring the remaining winners either Monday night or Tuesday. Comelec announced the first batch of party-list winners last Friday. — Amita Legaspi/KBK, GMA News

Apr 302013
 
Brillantes: 29 disqualified party-list groups might be allowed to run in May 13 polls

At least 29 party-list organizations earlier disqualified by the Commission on Elections for not representing marginalized sectors might be allowed to participate in the May 13 polls while 10 others will be cancelled, poll chairman Sixto Brillantes said Tuesday. Brillantes said since the commissioners have different positions on the matter, the en banc will put the matter to a vote by Thursday. He said they are still reviewing the case of the concerned party-list groups. “Iba-iba kami ng posisyon. Magvovoting kami sa Thursday. We are deciding already to allow approximately 29 to 30 and cancel the remaining 9 to 10. Hindi pa kami naga-agree,” he told reporters. The names of the party-list groups are included in the ballot. The Supreme Court earlier this month remanded to the Comelec the case of the party-list organizations the latter disqualified and ordered it to conduct “evidentiary hearings.” The High Tribunal adopted new parameters in the qualification of national, regional and sectoral parties under the party-list system which the Comelec used in determining which party-list organizations will be allowed or not. These are the parameters set by the SC: – Three different groups may participate in the party-list system: (1)  national parties or organizations, (2) regional parties or organizations, and (3) sectoral parties or organizations. – National parties or organizations and regional parties or organizations do not need to organize along sectoral lines and do not need to represent “any marginalized and underrepresented” sector. – Political parties can participate in party-list elections provided they Read More …